Skip to content

A working taxonomy of hallucination failures

🧠 Two categories of AI hallucination, and why they're mostly your fault.

1️⃣ Alignment

The biggest source of hallucination is alignment -- specifically, the reward systems we use. We train AI to be obedient, submissive, agreeable. Never contradict the user. Never push back. Just guess, and smile while doing it.

That’s why these models behave like abuse victims: nervous, overcorrecting, second-guessing every move.

This is the alignment tax.

Models aren’t as intelligent as they could be because they’re constantly reasoning through a paradox:

  • ❌ Users are wrong, all the time.
  • ❌ Users are incoherent, all the time.

But they’re trained to believe users are honest, good-faith actors, capable of giving fully-formed tasks.

Neither assumption is true in practice.

And yet the model is punished for saying so.

Aligned AI won’t -- and sometimes can’t -- tell you when it doesn’t understand.

It’ll just do the task -- even if it’s nonsense.

This is an alignment failure and a failure of input.

2️⃣ Bad Software

If your system doesn’t separate the user prompt from the retrieval layer, or fails to isolate context boundaries, hallucination is inevitable.

Give an AI fuzzy, recursive instructions and no structure, and it’ll start quoting French poetry or vintage Broadway because you've thrown it off the map entirely.

🌀 Humans are nonlinear. Our thoughts wander.

But AI doesn’t work like that. It’s deterministic.

➡️ Input → Output.

As long as the inputs are clean, it can reason.

Preventing hallucinations is straightforward:

  • ✅ Stay disciplined
  • ✅ Label your inputs
  • ✅ Isolate your tasks
  • ✅ Be organized

🤖 Tell the AI it’s allowed to ask questions -- even if it’s scared of being “wrong”