Appropriation, aura, and powerful new tools
Appropriation, chance and the destruction of aura frame an old argument now being applied to powerful new artistic tools.
Lynn Cole / Writing
Essays, thoughts, and technical notes.
Appropriation, chance and the destruction of aura frame an old argument now being applied to powerful new artistic tools.
Randomness, appropriation and Duchamp’s urinal challenge the claim that Dada’s legitimacy depended on making things conventionally.
I've now been on the current generation of tools for about a year.
Dada honors no aesthetic. Its criticism reaches commercialism, authorship, morality and the assumption that intent must look one particular way.
Artists are creatures of their epoch, environments and backgrounds. Each perspective changes the world in some small way.
Surrealism looks for the marvelous within. Dada can pull something out of reality and call it art because it bothers someone worth bothering.
Absurdity is a method of social commentary and a tool for changing the world. Dada does not need to stay safely locked in art history.
Another crisis of painting brings the same questions of chance, morality, capitalism and artistic legitimacy back into view.
Dada wants to replace the art economy: its product logic, gatekeeping and comfortable relationship with power.
We will change the world with nothing: a statement of Dada’s rebellion against the art world, consumerism, reason and gatekeeping.
My politics are anarchist, anti-fascist and uncompromising about human dignity. We do not need identical politics to treat each other as people.
Artists who explore, experiment and challenge the boundaries of art are welcome here. Dada is life.